W15.1-GUO YING

 1) Summary of the reading

This reading provides an introduction to Wikipedia’s Manual of Style (MOS), which serves as a guide for writing and formatting articles in a consistent and professional manner. The Manual of Style does not dictate article content; instead, it focuses on how information should be presented to improve readability, clarity, and accessibility. The guide explains that Wikipedia articles should follow a standardized style in areas such as language use, formatting, punctuation, capitalization, and article structure. Consistency across articles helps readers navigate Wikipedia more easily and gives the encyclopedia a coherent appearance. The reading also emphasizes that editors should use common sense and prioritize clarity when applying style guidelines.

2) New or interesting points

One interesting point is that the Manual of Style is not a rigid set of rules but rather a collection of guidelines developed through community consensus. Editors are encouraged to follow the guidelines while also considering what best serves readers. I also found it notable that style consistency is viewed as an important part of Wikipedia’s credibility. Even though articles are written by thousands of different contributors, the Manual of Style helps create a unified and professional presentation. Another interesting aspect is the emphasis on accessibility. Many style recommendations are designed not only to improve appearance but also to ensure that articles can be understood and used by a wide range of readers.

3) Questions / discussion points

I wonder how editors balance flexibility and consistency when applying the Manual of Style. Since articles cover a wide variety of subjects, there may be situations where strict adherence to a guideline does not seem ideal. How do editors decide when an exception is appropriate? I am also curious about how style disputes are resolved when contributors have different opinions about formatting or presentation. Finally, because the Manual of Style evolves over time through community discussion, I wonder how editors stay informed about changes and ensure that older articles continue to reflect current standards.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2026) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be...
Read more

WEEK2— WANG SIWEN

During this week, I made 15 edits on Wikipedia and also created a new personal sandbox. Most of my edits focused on adding new content and translating information between different language versions of articles. Through this process, I tried to make the content clearer and more accessible to readers from different language backgrounds. In addition, I created a new sandbox to practice editing and organize my ideas before publishing them on the main article pages. The sandbox allowed me to test formatting and translation structures more carefully, which helped me avoid mistakes in public articles. This week’s editing experience helped me understand that translation on Wikipedia is not simply changing words from one language to another. It also requires attention to accuracy, context, and neutrality so that the information remains reliable and consistent with Wikipedia’s standards. Overall, this week’s work helped me improve my editing and translation skills, and it also gave me a deeper ...
Read more

WEEK2 ——edits on Wikipedia

During this week, I made several edits on Wikipedia. My main work was adding citations to some sentences that lacked sources in order to improve the reliability of the article content. For example, I added citations from gaming media websites for descriptions of the influence of characters in the Resident Evil series, and also supplemented official sources for the feature introduction of the Origin platform. These edits can be seen in my Wikipedia contributions history. User contributions for Wjyy1212 - Wikipedia  While editing these pages, I learned about some content I hadn't noticed before. For instance, how digital gaming platforms like Origin operate—players no longer need physical discs after purchasing a game but can download it directly through their account. This reflects the development trend in the gaming industry from physical distribution to digital distribution.In addition, the influence of game characters should not be underestimated.  I also have questions I wo...
Read more