Week12-Understanding Wikipedia Advanced editing or how to write high quality conten—JIN CHUYUE

1. Summary

This week’s class was about advanced Wikipedia editing and how to write good, high-quality articles. We learned the main rules: using reliable sources, keeping a neutral tone, and organizing the content clearly. The lesson also explained how to request peer reviews to get feedback and improve our work. All these rules are there to keep Wikipedia’s information accurate and trustworthy.

2. Interesting Learning Point

The most surprising thing for me was realizing what makes an article “high quality.” I always thought adding more facts was enough, but it turns out citing sources correctly, writing in a neutral way, and having a clear structure are just as important. I also didn’t know you could ask for an assessment to get feedback on your work. It feels really helpful for new editors like me.

3. Question for Discussion

I’m still confused about how to keep up with these high standards when I want to contribute quickly. When I edit a topic I care about, I get excited to add information right away, but I’m scared I’ll mess up the citations or sound biased. I wonder if there are simple checklists or tools that can help new editors follow these rules without feeling overwhelmed.

Comments

  1. HO RYUYEONGMay 15, 2026 at 10:47 PM

    Your Section 3 concern is really relatable — I felt the same way when I first started editing.

    From what I've seen, Wikipedia actually does have some built-in tools for this. The "Article development" page we read this week lists quality criteria pretty explicitly by stage (Stub → Start → B-class, etc.), so it can work as a rough checklist. There's also the Talk page of most articles where other editors sometimes leave specific feedback, which helps you figure out what's missing before you even submit for a formal review.

    One thing that helped me was thinking of citations as you go rather than at the end — it's much less overwhelming than trying to source everything after writing.

    — [호류영 / Ho Ryuyeong]

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2026) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be...
Read more

WEEK2— WANG SIWEN

During this week, I made 15 edits on Wikipedia and also created a new personal sandbox. Most of my edits focused on adding new content and translating information between different language versions of articles. Through this process, I tried to make the content clearer and more accessible to readers from different language backgrounds. In addition, I created a new sandbox to practice editing and organize my ideas before publishing them on the main article pages. The sandbox allowed me to test formatting and translation structures more carefully, which helped me avoid mistakes in public articles. This week’s editing experience helped me understand that translation on Wikipedia is not simply changing words from one language to another. It also requires attention to accuracy, context, and neutrality so that the information remains reliable and consistent with Wikipedia’s standards. Overall, this week’s work helped me improve my editing and translation skills, and it also gave me a deeper ...
Read more

WEEK2 ——edits on Wikipedia

During this week, I made several edits on Wikipedia. My main work was adding citations to some sentences that lacked sources in order to improve the reliability of the article content. For example, I added citations from gaming media websites for descriptions of the influence of characters in the Resident Evil series, and also supplemented official sources for the feature introduction of the Origin platform. These edits can be seen in my Wikipedia contributions history. User contributions for Wjyy1212 - Wikipedia  While editing these pages, I learned about some content I hadn't noticed before. For instance, how digital gaming platforms like Origin operate—players no longer need physical discs after purchasing a game but can download it directly through their account. This reflects the development trend in the gaming industry from physical distribution to digital distribution.In addition, the influence of game characters should not be underestimated.  I also have questions I wo...
Read more