Week11: Wikimedia Commons - Lee Joowon

 Wikimedia Commons is a free media repository that provides multimedia content that anyone can use freely. Content that can be uploaded is limited to multimedia, excluding text or mobile app software. All files uploaded to Commons must be in the public domain or under a free license such as CC BY/BY-SA, and do not accept 'fair use' works. In addition, Commons uses categories and gallery systems complementarily to manage media systematically.

 In the case of works imported from external sites, it was impressive that even if the original author changes the CC license to paid conditions later, the free license that has been uploaded to Commons and has already been verified will remain in effect and will not be deleted. This seems to be a reasonable rule to ensure the stability of digital archiving, and at the same time, there seems to be a limit that the rights of the original author may not be sufficiently protected.

 However, I wondered if it would be a loss as a media storage if media materials of high educational value could not be uploaded to Commons due to copyright and licensing issues. Commons copyright and licensing policy guarantees versatility and freedom of commercial reuse, but there are limitations to the abundant storage of media materials related to popular culture and modern history. Therefore, I think more discussion is needed.

Comments

  1. Nguyen Duc DuyMay 17, 2026 at 6:07 AM

    I think your writing explains Wikimedia Commons in a very clear and organized way. I also found the point about copyright interesting because many people may not know that free licenses on Commons cannot simply be removed later. Your discussion about the balance between copyright protection and educational access is also meaningful. I agree that strict licensing rules can sometimes limit useful media from being shared, especially materials related to modern culture and history.

    ReplyDelete
  2. wyyz02June 14, 2026 at 2:57 AM

    I really enjoyed reading your reflection on Wikimedia Commons. You clearly explained how the platform works and why free licenses are important for sharing knowledge and media resources. I was especially interested in your point about how educational materials and historical media can sometimes be limited by strict copyright policies. Your discussion about balancing copyright protection with public access to knowledge was thoughtful and meaningful. Overall, your blog was well-organized and helped me better understand both the advantages and limitations of Wikimedia Commons.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2026) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be...
Read more

WEEK2— WANG SIWEN

During this week, I made 15 edits on Wikipedia and also created a new personal sandbox. Most of my edits focused on adding new content and translating information between different language versions of articles. Through this process, I tried to make the content clearer and more accessible to readers from different language backgrounds. In addition, I created a new sandbox to practice editing and organize my ideas before publishing them on the main article pages. The sandbox allowed me to test formatting and translation structures more carefully, which helped me avoid mistakes in public articles. This week’s editing experience helped me understand that translation on Wikipedia is not simply changing words from one language to another. It also requires attention to accuracy, context, and neutrality so that the information remains reliable and consistent with Wikipedia’s standards. Overall, this week’s work helped me improve my editing and translation skills, and it also gave me a deeper ...
Read more

WEEK2 ——edits on Wikipedia

During this week, I made several edits on Wikipedia. My main work was adding citations to some sentences that lacked sources in order to improve the reliability of the article content. For example, I added citations from gaming media websites for descriptions of the influence of characters in the Resident Evil series, and also supplemented official sources for the feature introduction of the Origin platform. These edits can be seen in my Wikipedia contributions history. User contributions for Wjyy1212 - Wikipedia  While editing these pages, I learned about some content I hadn't noticed before. For instance, how digital gaming platforms like Origin operate—players no longer need physical discs after purchasing a game but can download it directly through their account. This reflects the development trend in the gaming industry from physical distribution to digital distribution.In addition, the influence of game characters should not be underestimated.  I also have questions I wo...
Read more