Week5: Wikipedia Editing - Lee Joowon

 This week, I added information to our existing Wikipedia document to reflect recent changes, and inserted a footnote with reliable news articles to support what I added. Through this process, I have contributed to increasing the accuracy of the document. Here is the link I edited.

 During this editing, I felt that when updating the latest information, it was much more important to clarify whether the source of that information was reliable, rather than adding it quickly and in large numbers. In particular, the process of determining whether the source of the information was reliable or biased was more difficult because there were not so many sources of information that had recently changed. However, I also felt satisfied with the idea that Wikipedia's quality was maintained through this process.

 In the case of popular culture and companies, the pace of change is very fast and new information is constantly updated. In this situation, I wonder if it is more appropriate to prioritize news reports or official materials with real-time information when updating documents. News reports can get information quickly, but the facts may not have been sufficiently verified, and official materials may be biased from the standpoint of companies, although the information is relatively accurate.

Comments

  1. I like how you highlighted the importance of verifying sources rather than just adding information quickly. Your point about balancing speed and accuracy in fast-changing topics like popular culture and companies is very relevant. It makes me wonder how editors decide when to rely on news reports versus official materials.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

WEEK2— WANG SIWEN

WEEK2 ——edits on Wikipedia