WEEK2: Wikipedia: Collaboration and Sharing Knowledge - Nguyen Duc Duy

 Wikipedia is one of the most widely used sources of information in the world, and Joseph Michael Reagle Jr.’s Good Faith Collaboration explains how it developed and why people can work together on it. Wikipedia is not just an online encyclopedia; it is also a community of volunteers who write and edit articles from all over the world. Its main goal is to freely share knowledge with everyone, continuing the ideas of earlier projects, such as Paul Otlet’s attempt to organize all knowledge and H. G. Wells’s “World Brain.” Later innovations like Nupedia, Project Gutenberg, and open-source software also helped create the conditions for Wikipedia. One interesting point is that Wikipedia relies on both openness and shared rules. Anyone can contribute, but the community uses administrators, policies, and discussion pages to manage conflicts and maintain quality. Contributors work together, discuss ideas, and try to reach agreements on articles, which shows how collaboration is central to Wikipedia’s success. I was surprised that even with so many volunteers, this system can produce reliable information most of the time. At the same time, challenges remain, such as keeping articles accurate and neutral, especially on controversial topics. This raises a question I want to discuss in class: how does Wikipedia prevent false information or bias while still allowing anyone to edit? Overall, Wikipedia shows that people from around the world can cooperate, share knowledge, and create a valuable resource, demonstrating the power of collective effort in the digital age.

Comments

  1. LEE JOOWONMarch 15, 2026 at 7:51 AM

    I agree that collaboration is central to Wikipedia's success. I think the rule that requires a reliable reference is playing a big role in the challenge of keeping the accuracy and neutrality of the article. However, even in this situation, it seems clear that more effort is needed because the content of the article can be skewed in certain directions depending on the propensity of the editors.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2026) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be...
Read more

WEEK2— WANG SIWEN

During this week, I made 15 edits on Wikipedia and also created a new personal sandbox. Most of my edits focused on adding new content and translating information between different language versions of articles. Through this process, I tried to make the content clearer and more accessible to readers from different language backgrounds. In addition, I created a new sandbox to practice editing and organize my ideas before publishing them on the main article pages. The sandbox allowed me to test formatting and translation structures more carefully, which helped me avoid mistakes in public articles. This week’s editing experience helped me understand that translation on Wikipedia is not simply changing words from one language to another. It also requires attention to accuracy, context, and neutrality so that the information remains reliable and consistent with Wikipedia’s standards. Overall, this week’s work helped me improve my editing and translation skills, and it also gave me a deeper ...
Read more

WEEK2 ——edits on Wikipedia

During this week, I made several edits on Wikipedia. My main work was adding citations to some sentences that lacked sources in order to improve the reliability of the article content. For example, I added citations from gaming media websites for descriptions of the influence of characters in the Resident Evil series, and also supplemented official sources for the feature introduction of the Origin platform. These edits can be seen in my Wikipedia contributions history. User contributions for Wjyy1212 - Wikipedia  While editing these pages, I learned about some content I hadn't noticed before. For instance, how digital gaming platforms like Origin operate—players no longer need physical discs after purchasing a game but can download it directly through their account. This reflects the development trend in the gaming industry from physical distribution to digital distribution.In addition, the influence of game characters should not be underestimated.  I also have questions I wo...
Read more