week2 LIU JINGXUAN

 1. Wikipedia Sandbox Feature

The Wikipedia Sandbox is a practice space where users can test editing before publishing real articles. I learned that many students and beginners use the Sandbox to practice formatting, references, and writing styles without damaging actual Wikipedia pages. This feature is interesting because it works like a “training room” inside Wikipedia. One thing I found unusual is that even experienced editors sometimes use the Sandbox to prepare large edits safely. However, I also think there is a limitation because new users may still feel confused about Wikipedia’s editing rules and technical codes. It could be useful if Wikipedia provided more beginner-friendly guidance inside the Sandbox itself.

2. How to Leave (and Read) a Wikipedia Talk Message

Wikipedia talk pages are used for communication between editors. I learned that users can leave messages to discuss article problems, ask questions, or suggest improvements. One interesting point is that communication on Wikipedia is expected to stay polite and collaborative even when editors disagree. I also discovered that signatures and timestamps are important because they help organize discussions clearly. A question I still have is how conflicts are solved when editors strongly disagree about information. It seems that discussion and consensus are important, but the process may still become complicated.

3. Understanding Wikipedia / Why Wikipedia

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia created by volunteers around the world. I learned that its main goal is to provide accessible knowledge for everyone. One new point for me was that Wikipedia values neutrality very strongly, meaning editors should avoid personal opinions. This makes Wikipedia different from blogs or social media platforms. At the same time, I think there are concerns about reliability because anyone can edit articles. Even though there are rules and editors checking information, incorrect content can still appear temporarily. This raises an important discussion about how online knowledge should be verified in the digital age.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2026) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be...
Read more

WEEK2— WANG SIWEN

During this week, I made 15 edits on Wikipedia and also created a new personal sandbox. Most of my edits focused on adding new content and translating information between different language versions of articles. Through this process, I tried to make the content clearer and more accessible to readers from different language backgrounds. In addition, I created a new sandbox to practice editing and organize my ideas before publishing them on the main article pages. The sandbox allowed me to test formatting and translation structures more carefully, which helped me avoid mistakes in public articles. This week’s editing experience helped me understand that translation on Wikipedia is not simply changing words from one language to another. It also requires attention to accuracy, context, and neutrality so that the information remains reliable and consistent with Wikipedia’s standards. Overall, this week’s work helped me improve my editing and translation skills, and it also gave me a deeper ...
Read more

WEEK2 ——edits on Wikipedia

During this week, I made several edits on Wikipedia. My main work was adding citations to some sentences that lacked sources in order to improve the reliability of the article content. For example, I added citations from gaming media websites for descriptions of the influence of characters in the Resident Evil series, and also supplemented official sources for the feature introduction of the Origin platform. These edits can be seen in my Wikipedia contributions history. User contributions for Wjyy1212 - Wikipedia  While editing these pages, I learned about some content I hadn't noticed before. For instance, how digital gaming platforms like Origin operate—players no longer need physical discs after purchasing a game but can download it directly through their account. This reflects the development trend in the gaming industry from physical distribution to digital distribution.In addition, the influence of game characters should not be underestimated.  I also have questions I wo...
Read more