Week 3: Wikis and Internet 2.0 (NGUYEN KIM CHI)

 When I think about the Internet today, one of the most interesting changes is how knowledge is created. In the past, information on the Internet mostly came from organizations, experts, or official publishers. But with the development of Web 2.0, the Internet became a place where ordinary people could also contribute knowledge. One of the best examples of this change is Wikipedia and the idea of wikis.

A wiki is a type of website that allows users to create and edit content directly in their web browser. The word “wiki” means “super fast” in Hawaiian, which reflects how quickly information can be added or updated. This simple editing system makes it possible for many people to collaborate on the same page over time. Because of this, knowledge is no longer produced only by experts but by communities of contributors from around the world.

Wikipedia represents a major shift in how encyclopedias are created. Traditional encyclopedias were written by selected experts and published as finished books. In contrast, Wikipedia is constantly evolving because it is created by an online community. At any moment, the encyclopedia is basically a snapshot of an ongoing conversation among thousands of contributors who are discussing, editing, and improving articles.

One important feature of this collaborative model is the culture of “good faith collaboration.” Contributors are expected to assume that other editors are trying to help improve the encyclopedia. Even when disagreements happen, the community usually tries to solve them through discussion and by following shared policies. Some of the most important rules include maintaining a neutral point of view, avoiding original research, and providing verifiable sources. These rules help ensure that the information remains reliable even though anyone can participate.

However, openness also creates challenges. Because Wikipedia allows almost anyone to edit, the site can be vandalized or misused. For example, false information or biased content can sometimes appear in articles. To deal with this problem, the community developed tools such as page protection, user blocking, and revision tracking. These mechanisms try to balance openness with the need to maintain quality.

Another important aspect of wikis is transparency. Every change to a Wikipedia article is recorded in its history page, which means anyone can see who edited the article and what changes were made. This transparency helps build accountability within the community. It also allows new contributors to learn how the editing process works by observing previous discussions and decisions.

The idea of collaborative knowledge production in Wikipedia is also influenced by the Free and Open Source Software movement. Just like open source programmers work together to develop software, Wikipedia contributors work together to build and improve articles. In both cases, openness allows people from different backgrounds to participate and share their expertise.

In my opinion, Wikipedia and other wiki-based platforms represent one of the most powerful aspects of Internet 2.0. They show that large groups of people can collaborate online to create something valuable. Even though the system is not perfect and sometimes messy, it demonstrates how digital communities can produce knowledge collectively.

Overall, wikis illustrate how the Internet has evolved from a static information system into a collaborative knowledge network. Instead of simply consuming information, users can now actively participate in creating it. This transformation is one of the defining characteristics of Internet 2.0 and continues to shape how we learn, share, and communicate online.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2026) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be...
Read more

WEEK2— WANG SIWEN

During this week, I made 15 edits on Wikipedia and also created a new personal sandbox. Most of my edits focused on adding new content and translating information between different language versions of articles. Through this process, I tried to make the content clearer and more accessible to readers from different language backgrounds. In addition, I created a new sandbox to practice editing and organize my ideas before publishing them on the main article pages. The sandbox allowed me to test formatting and translation structures more carefully, which helped me avoid mistakes in public articles. This week’s editing experience helped me understand that translation on Wikipedia is not simply changing words from one language to another. It also requires attention to accuracy, context, and neutrality so that the information remains reliable and consistent with Wikipedia’s standards. Overall, this week’s work helped me improve my editing and translation skills, and it also gave me a deeper ...
Read more

WEEK2 ——edits on Wikipedia

During this week, I made several edits on Wikipedia. My main work was adding citations to some sentences that lacked sources in order to improve the reliability of the article content. For example, I added citations from gaming media websites for descriptions of the influence of characters in the Resident Evil series, and also supplemented official sources for the feature introduction of the Origin platform. These edits can be seen in my Wikipedia contributions history. User contributions for Wjyy1212 - Wikipedia  While editing these pages, I learned about some content I hadn't noticed before. For instance, how digital gaming platforms like Origin operate—players no longer need physical discs after purchasing a game but can download it directly through their account. This reflects the development trend in the gaming industry from physical distribution to digital distribution.In addition, the influence of game characters should not be underestimated.  I also have questions I wo...
Read more